No one can say that they are not concerned by the war in the Far North of the country and what has today even become a war against terrorist movements in the North-West and South-West regions. When the government speaks of “regions économiquement sinistrées”, this means that it is the security and economy of the entire Territory which is negatively impacted by these two wars. The impact of a war on one or more parts of the Territory impacts the entire Territory. This is not just about the Far North, North West and South West regions. There is a war to be financed which has a significant cost which has an impact on growth. The soldiers who die are not only nationals of these regions, nor are the bereaved families. To this we must add external, and especially internal, migrations. In the case of the crises in the North-West and South-West regions, several sections of the populations, particularly from rural areas, have migrated particularly towards the Littoral and Central regions where they live in difficult conditions despite the resilience they demonstrate. Indeed, being disoriented overnight requires additional efforts which do not always guarantee a life similar to the one we had before. Reintegration is not only necessary at the level of ex-combatants. Even those who have not taken up arms, and who have chosen to preserve their lives elsewhere, are also obliged to reintegrate socially.
For ex-combatants, the government has put forward as a means of reintegration the promotion of “small trades” in the fields of agriculture, IT and carpentry among others. Initiatives in line with the need for reform of educational programs focused much more on theory than practice. Even if it is not the acquisition of qualifications which will guarantee a fulfilling life, the acquisition of know-how gives the opportunity to undertake and obtain employment more easily.
In February 2021, residents of the disarmament, demobilization and reintegration centres in Buea had notably demanded allowances to meet their daily needs, as well as better living conditions, among other things. These are demands which reflect a social malaise that a good majority of young Cameroonians claim, in a country where according to the fifth Cameroonian household survey and published in 2022 by the national statistics institute, around 4 out of 10 people are poor. Note that the World Bank assesses poverty in the world on two internationally recognized thresholds, namely those who live on less than one (1) and two (2) dollars per day. On a population estimated at that time at nearly twenty-seven million, 10.1 million lived on less than two dollars a day. That is to say 813 CFA F/day or 24.724 CFA F/month. Note that according to this fifth survey, the well-being indicator in 2022 stood on average at 1,363 CFA francs per person per day, and the poverty threshold as defined in this fifth survey, “is the well-being indicator below which it is impossible to afford the minimum necessary on a daily basis; that is to say, obtaining a nutritionally adequate diet and meeting basic non-food needs; i.e. 24.724 CFA F/month, and 813 CFA F/day. This means that living conditions are difficult, and the longer the conflict lasts, the more difficult it will be to remedy this situation which will require Cameroonians to throw down their arms, so that we can harmoniously resolve the demands of a minority, which reflect those of a good majority.
We must therefore tackle the problem at the root. The accumulation of frustrations and feelings of marginalization, motivated by the prevailing precariousness among others, have led several Cameroonians to take up arms against their country, who cannot wage war on himself. Declaring war on a terrorist organization does not mean declaring war on young Cameroonians who have chosen to join the opposing camp for economic, social and political reasons. Fighting secessionist movements means being in a state of legitimate force, while putting in place measures aimed at getting certain young Cameroonians to reconsider their choice to join enemy camps, by throwing down their weapons to start from scratch, even if the fact that their choice is understandable. It is in fact by acting in this way that we give young people reasons to hope in an environment where conditions are certainly not easy, but where efforts are still being made to remedy the situation, perhaps not completely, but continuously, by setting priorities in the short, medium and long term.
The young Cameroonian who takes up arms against his country is an example of illorientation. It is the case of young people whose feeling of despair is used by terrorist organizations and other secessionist movements to sow chaos. Cameroonians must no longer kill each other because there are individuals who have decided to achieve their sulphurous objectives at all costs; that is to say, until death, and by killing many people as possible from the opposite side.